Booz Allen Commercial delivers advanced cyber defenses to the Fortune 500 and Global 2000. We are technical practitioners and cyber-focused management consultants with unparalleled experience – we know how cyber-attacks happen and how to defend against them.
Our strategy and technology consultants have empowered our international clients with the knowledge and experience they need to build their own local resources and capabilities.
In facing challenges of modernization, our Middle East and North Africa clients have complex requirements that benefit from our proven experience in guiding major programs and projects for governments and private-sector organizations. The services we offer in UAE, Qatar, Egypt, Turkey, Kuwait, Morocco, Jordan, and other regional countries build on our consulting legacy.
Our clients call upon us to work on their hardest problems—delivering effective health care, protecting warfighters and their families, keeping our national infrastructure secure, bringing into focus the traditional boundaries between consumer products and manufacturing as those boundaries blur.
Booz Allen was founded on the notion that we could help companies succeed by bringing them expert, candid advice and an outside perspective on their business. The analysis and perspective generated by that talent can be found in the case studies and thought leadership produced by our people.
Learn more about Booz Allen's diverse culture and environment of inclusion that fosters respect and opportunity for all employees.
We've come a long way delivering innovative solutions. But our next chapter is still being written.
Our 22,600 engineers, scientists, software developers, technologists, and consultants live to solve problems that matter. We’re proud of the diversity throughout our organization, from our most junior ranks to our board of directors and leadership team.
Booz Allen takes pride in a culture that encourages and rewards the many dimensions of leadership—innovative thinking, active collaboration, and personal service. We’re particularly proud of the diversity of our Leadership Team and Board of Directors, among the most diverse in corporate America today.
It’s full steam ahead—Federal organizations have the green light to move ahead with IT modernization efforts. From the Modernizing Government Technology Act and the White House American Technology Council Report to the 2018 President’s Management Agenda, the vision—and the need—for IT modernization is clear.
Cloud migration is a top priority in the push to modernize federal IT systems. Many government organizations recognize the importance of adopting cloud services, but often have misconceptions around cost savings and security risks, among other things.
Here are five key myths about cloud migration—and the reality.
Myth No. 1: The cloud is always cheaper.
The Reality: As part of a migration strategy, you should consider the application’s or solution’s total cost of ownership. For siloed, non-transactional applications, a standard “lift and shift” migration to the cloud might not be worth it. There are many reasons to move to the cloud, including easily deploying new capabilities to your applications, or elastic scaling based on demand. But for some workloads, you may not see an immediate drop in operational costs.
Myth No. 2: All our organizational data should be in the cloud. All our data processing should take place there, too.
The Reality: There’s not always enough pipe and bandwidth for all your data to be in the cloud. Attempting to move large amounts of data from the cloud to the end user, or to “the edge,” can strangle the network. With data-intensive workloads or analysis that requires a significant amount of processing (e.g., machine learning algorithms), a hybrid architecture or decentralized data processing may be a more reasonable model.
Myth No. 3: Cloud is inherently insecure. It can’t support my organization’s most sensitive workloads or data.
The Reality: Not true. The proliferation of industry-mandated security frameworks—such as the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP), the Risk Management Framework (RMF), and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)—as well as contemporary tooling and monitoring, and dedicated cloud service provider (CSP) enclaves that align to a broad set of data sensitivity levels means the commercial cloud can address nearly all workloads, including those managed by the Department of Defense (DoD) and intelligence communities. The critical aspect of an organization’s migration and hosting strategy can be found in the ability of the application owner, integrator, and CSP to properly delineate where responsibility lies for securing the different layers of application and infrastructure architecture.
Myth No. 4: To take advantage of the cloud, my organization should adopt an enterprise-wide, or application-wide, cloud-native architectural approach.
The Reality: There’s tremendous efficiency and flexibility in being able to decompose your workloads into container-based microservices that can be independently updated, scaled, and deployed. However, shifting to a cloud-native environment doesn’t have to be a “big bang” event. Establishing interim milestones such as introducing domain-driven design, containerizing traditional applications, and maturing your DevSecOps pipeline will move you down the path to cloud native and provide transitional operational efficiencies and benefits.
Myth No. 5: In the event of a disruptive event such as a power outage, natural disaster, or cyberattack, we need a multi-CSP strategy as our failover and disaster recovery (DR) plan for application workloads.
The Reality: Architecting cross-CSP backup and recovery for a single workload can result in paying a high cost for a low-risk event. The chance is infinitesimal that all of your cloud service provider’s availability zones would go down at the same time. Instead, start by building fault tolerance into your architecture, take advantage of multiple availability zones within your cloud service provider’s ecosystem, and conduct a risk-based cost-benefit analysis as a part of DR planning.
The reality is, government agencies need to consider many issues—cost, security and scale, among others—in a cloud move. The Federal Government and DoD, in conjunction with CSPs, are lowering the barrier to cloud migration. Integrators that understand the mission and agency data can help federal agencies develop and implement a strategic cloud approach that balances long-term organizational needs with technological advances.